Companies involve employees in decision making policy. Is this a good approach? Do you agree or disagree?
Over the past couple of decades, the question of whether employee involvement in organizations is a neat
approach has generated a great deal of debate and discussion among employers and workers. The popular belief seems to be that managers should engage their personnel in decision making. I cannot but agree with this view for social and economic reasons and I will analyze that through this essay.
First and foremost, it is a well-established fact that employee engagement leads to a good attitude towards
a company by workers. Simply put, employees find their role influential. In fact, rarely can we see a company which involve its staff in decision making and have bad colleague relationship.
More significantly, not only can employee involvement improve workers' attitude towards the company, but also
it can make them enthusiastic. Evidently, employees realize that they can move up within the career paths. In the
long run, it prompt them to have a promising career prospect.
Another compelling argument in support of this view could be the fact that employee engagement leads to productivity. Undoubtedly, staff feel more responsibility due to decisions which are made by both themselves and their managers. Hence, under no circumstances should we underestimate the colossal role of involving employees in decision making.
Having considered all sides, I conclude that involving human resources in setting up policies in companies is
highly beneficial due to reasons such as alleviating career outlook, making workers eager to work better and
a remarkable progress in productivity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-29 | mohab.elhaddad | 77 | view |
| 2018-02-18 | amiratri | 77 | view |
- Some tourists tend to stay in resorts and enjoy prepared facilities, others like to travel around country and visit people and know about their customs. Which one is the best for both tourists and native people? 77
- Government should set deterrent against using tobacco.to some extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Laws can change human behavior. Do you agree or disagree? 79
- Parents are responsible for their children's behavior. Do you agree or disagree? 79
- Learning foreign languages in primary school in more effective for the students? Do you agree or disagree? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
Over the past couple of decades, the question of whether employee involvement in organizations i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... move up within the career paths. In the long run, it prompt them to have a promi...
^^^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'prompts'?
Suggestion: prompts
...the career paths. In the long run, it prompt them to have a promising career prospec...
^^^^^^
Line 10, column 109, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... making workers eager to work better and a remarkable progress in productivity. ...
^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'remarkable progress'.
Suggestion: remarkable progress
...king workers eager to work better and a remarkable progress in productivity.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, look, so, thus, well, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 249.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46987951807 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09212954788 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618473895582 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6232562713 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.769230769 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1538461538 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15384615385 7.25397266985 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 11.0 4.12807881773 266% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282741225777 0.242375264174 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0862352763207 0.0925447433944 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446395369479 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0871299311941 0.151781067708 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565341443343 0.0609392437508 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.