compulsory voting
Recently, the phenomenon of compulsory voting and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that being mandatory is highly beneficial, such issue might be regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that every contribution can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, voting can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that social welfare and safety are intertwined inextricably with not only social activity but also taking responsibility. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic research which discovered governmental decision. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both democratic and parliamentary society apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of academic science, presidential election can increase the consequences of participating in social and public events. Moreover, fundamental aspects of choosing freely relate to this reality that election pertains to free on any enforcement. As a tangible example, a scientific study undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of democratic policy is correlated negatively with democratic nations. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of putting people under pressure.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the democratic country far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of reduction in their efficiency prove the significance of government, but also pinpoint free implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-17 | Rafia Jawad | 88 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | mohammadsabet | 88 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | mohammadsabet | 88 | view |
| 2023-03-19 | christine112 | view | |
| 2022-03-07 | pursuenglish | 80 | view |
- Some people think that children should receive formal training at school on how to be good parents in the future. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 50
- Some people think that companies and private individuals should pay to clean up the pollution that they produce not the government To what extent do you agree or disagree 48
- Can the law change human behavior? 88
- Law can change human's behavior, do you agree or disagree? 85
- Do you think consumers should avoid over-packaged products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience. 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 251.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81274900398 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34053232343 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657370517928 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3130114093 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.583333333 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0940526953586 0.242375264174 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0339603435606 0.0925447433944 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.092977330436 0.071462118173 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0494295773667 0.151781067708 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599184007782 0.0609392437508 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.79 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.