Do you think consumer should avoid over packaged products or it is the manufacturer that should avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience.
The importance of consumer power over market, was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of over packaged products has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on consumer's or manufacturer's responsibility in recent years. It can be agreed that manufacturer should look after this issue but some people claim that it is not their responsibility. This essay will elaborate how consumer and manufacturer avoid extra packaging of products and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why manufacturer should give high priority to packaging but the most conspicuous one steams form the fact that everyone should save natural resources which are used to pack products. Packaging use lot of our trees and other important resources such as oil, coal, fresh air, etc. For instance, one of my friend bought a gift for me and the product has really good quality outfit. Thus, manufacture plays a vital role in preventing over packaging.
On the contrary, some people adopted an opposing view and tend to believe that consumer's responsibility to stop buying over packaged product. Even-though, consumer only attract by seeing good presented packaging. Companies are giving what is asked by their customer. For example, a company was selling their product for cheaper price and outfit with premium quality of product but they didn't manage to gain market shares over period of time. At the end, they have to follow consumer need and changed their product's packaging.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the influence of extra packaging is prominent, although, there are some drawbacks those should not be over looked.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-31 | shreyanshpte | 80 | view |
| 2019-07-13 | bita_harzandi@yahoo.com | 85 | view |
| 2018-05-17 | radhik | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...urces such as oil, coal, fresh air, etc. For instance, one of my friend bought a ...
^^
Line 5, column 80, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'consumers'' or 'consumer's'?
Suggestion: consumers'; consumer's
... opposing view and tend to believe that consumers responsibility to stop buying over pack...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 387, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ith premium quality of product but they didnt manage to gain market shares over perio...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 427, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...didnt manage to gain market shares over period of time. At the end, they have to follow consum...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 164, Rule ID: OVER_LOOKED[1]
Message: Did you mean 'overlooked'?
Suggestion: overlooked
... are some drawbacks those should not be over looked.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, really, so, thus, for example, for instance, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27338129496 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81648933668 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622302158273 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0283133526 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.714285714 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.25397266985 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327695151705 0.242375264174 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100554340839 0.0925447433944 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608641583978 0.071462118173 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184532110484 0.151781067708 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051609658697 0.0609392437508 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.