Do you think consumer should avoid over packaged products or it is the manufacturer that should avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience.

Essay topics:

Do you think consumer should avoid over packaged products or it is the manufacturer that should avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience.

Recently, the phenomenon of packaged products has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question " is it advantageous or not?". Whereas it is a widely held view that consumers are highly beneficial, I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, potential consumers are bound up inextricably with manufactured products, which indicates they lead both plastic packaging and useful products. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between product developments and environmental problems as well an exponential increase in attractive packaging. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of x is correlated positively with not only packaging products but also attracting products.
Within the realm of general science, without the slightest doubt, attracting products attribute to packaging products, in that it would become come down to potential customers, manufacturers, and consumer goods. A salient example of such attribution is eco-friendly packaging, which is cause for concern since it was mistaken to take environment problems for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint environmental problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of packaged products.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that end well," after analyzing what elaborated above. I firmly believe that the advantages of packaged products are of more significance.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-31 shreyanshpte 80 view
2019-07-13 bita_harzandi@yahoo.com 85 view
2018-05-17 radhik 80 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user bita_harzandi@… :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 77, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...aying goes 'alls well that end well,' after analyzing what elaborated above....
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 242.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90495867769 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33620559038 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.685950413223 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5590976428 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.909090909 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171625197834 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656948768652 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465911274027 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990871801338 0.151781067708 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225402927414 0.0609392437508 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.94 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.73 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.