Do you think the consumer should avoid over packed products or it is a responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience.
Recently, the phenomenon of the consumer should avoid over packed products or it is a responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures id highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that extra packaging of products can be a plus, and I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the overpacked products can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of critical issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered vocational education. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both complicated procedures and this common phenomenon apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, extra packaging of products might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of the faulty system could relate to this reality that the demerits of too much hearing pertain to health problems. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with complex issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of TOPIC far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint social implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-21 | gobindh Singh | 72 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | manraj123 | 11 | view |
| 2019-01-02 | dhavalpatel095 | 88 | view |
| 2018-04-08 | omer.cinpir | 77 | view |
| 2018-03-25 | Benzi | 85 | view |
- Violence portrayed on TV and in the movies leads to an increase in crime in our society. People who watch violent movies are more likely to become criminals. Do you agree or disagree? 80
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. Cashless society seems to be a reality, and how realistic do you think it is? What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 85
- Some believe it is hard to keep the balance between job and private and personal life. What do you think? As per your opinion what could be the possible reasons for that? 88
- Some universities deduct marks from students’ works if given in late, what are the problems and what is your opinion? 85
- sports, plating in a team or individual? what are the reviews and possible solutions for that? discuss. 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 267, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'procedures'' or 'procedure's'?
Suggestion: procedures'; procedure's
...sted by many that the matter of complex procedures id highly beneficial, such issue is reg...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20856634016 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628571428571 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0964115878 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.666666667 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209601666088 0.242375264174 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066566961596 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113869240614 0.071462118173 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109152610998 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104911278622 0.0609392437508 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.75 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.