Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibilty of producers to avoid over packaging
of products? Give your views or any relevant example of your own experience.
Nowadays, consumers are offered overpacked products, which attracted numerous controversies and drawn the attention
from the public. It can be agreed that consumers should avoid these overpackaged products, while on the other hand,
stands a perspective that producers are solely responsible for this problem. This essay will elaborate on both sides
and will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why consumers should avoid over packed products and the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that they are carried away by the flashy packaging of the products. As an illustration, we have seen many children get fascinated by the games which come under colored box wraps and appeal to their eyes. Moreover, these products are not even really needed by them and over burden their parent's pockets. Therefore, consumers should avoid these over packed products and minimize their expenses.
Nevertheless, there is another side, which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of overpacked products and,
the most alarming one is rooted in the fact that producers should not bombard the consumers with these kinds of products. For instance,producers should not deceive people by selling counterfeit or low quality products under these high cost packaging. Furthermore, it increases their cost of production and even suffer a major loss. Thus, producers should avoid creating confusion in the minds of people regarding the over packaged products.
In light of discussion above, it can be concluded that the impact of over packed products is prominent and the way they are presented to the general public should be well handled.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-02-11 | meenutalwar | 77 | view |
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibility of producers to avoid over-packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example of your own experience. 77
- What are the positive and negative effects of today’s communication? 85
- Any recent invention that you think has proved detrimental or beneficial to society? 11
- Poverty is a major issue worldwide. Many charities exist to help collect monetary donations. Who should decide what the donations are spent on? The people in need or the charitable organisations?Support your point of view from your own experience, observa 75
- It is argued that getting married before finishing school or getting a job is not a good choice. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 135, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , producers
...th these kinds of products. For instance,producers should not deceive people by selling co...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... regarding the over packaged products. In light of discussion above, it can be ...
^^^
Line 11, column 142, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...t and the way they are presented to the general public should be well handled.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, moreover, nevertheless, really, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4367816092 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8067690441 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570881226054 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1968347829 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.25 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0833333333 7.25397266985 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.12807881773 194% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294047379594 0.242375264174 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11862687009 0.0925447433944 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0944476660794 0.071462118173 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103621456701 0.151781067708 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0915025292736 0.0609392437508 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.