Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products , or is it the responsibility of producers?
These days over packing of the products are increasing in the market. For this packing a lot of plastic is used which damages the environment. To reduce these packing producers should take responsibility, because they are first producer of the packing
To begin with, the over packing of the food produces are introduced to the market especially for the junk foods. This over packing is the one of the marketing strategies to increasing the sales of their products. But by this, they are not recognizing that the over packing is waste of plastic use. For instance, a burger company will pack a burger in a paper and kept in a box, instead of that directly they can keep in the box by this using of the paper is reduced not only that the cost will also be reduced.
Secondly, the consumer should also take the small responsibility in controlling the over packed food, because the seller will add the cost of the packing into the customer bill. If the packing is reduced, simultaneously, the cost the product is reduced. By the excess amount of plastic and paper consumption emits co2 gases which are very harmful to environment.
By this it can be conclude that, over packing should be reduced while packing this responsibility should be taken by the producers and consumer should also take the responsibility by avoiding the over packed food.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-10 | heemagupta | 77 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | heemagupta | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | maniram vicky | 72 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | raavi sandhu | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | Ekta shah | 77 | view |
- It is said that learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Would it be more positive for their future aspect or will it have some adverse effects instead by learning a new language at an early age. What is your opinion on this? Suppo 55
- When computers first appeared on the scene,it was thought they would make us more productive in providing goods and services, smarter and possibly happier. Skeptics claim that the opposite is true as computers have proved disappointing in terms of product 22
- Some types of employment are more suitable for men and other types of employment are more appropriate for women.To what extent do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience. 62
- In under developed countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said the opposite as well. Discuss. 61
- Schools should prepare students for university, rather than for work, how far do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reason and/or example from your own experiences and observations 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e they are first producer of the packing To begin with, the over packing of the f...
^^^
Line 2, column 232, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...es of their products. But by this, they are not recognizing that the over packing is waste of plast...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lity by avoiding the over packed food.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1118.0 1207.87684729 93% => OK
No of words: 232.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81896551724 5.00649968141 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74674166497 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 139.433497537 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456896551724 0.580463131201 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 352.8 379.143842365 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6762515074 50.4703680194 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.8 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 6.9802955665 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 2.91625615764 240% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19829239027 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872632931892 0.0925447433944 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849640090448 0.071462118173 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151567463079 0.151781067708 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07769482857 0.0609392437508 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.1260098522 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.5310837438 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.32886699507 91% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 55.0591133005 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.