Do you think consumers should avoid over-packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers?
The consequences of over-packaging, which were always debatable, has become more controversial. The substantial influence of using extra material while packing a product has provoked a contention over the potential impact of this trend on product manufacturers. It can be agreed by many people that over-packaging have several benefits, however, others believe that it has a few negative impressions as well. This essay will elaborate on how over-packaging has devastating effects on the environment and prices and thus will reach a logical conclusion.
To begin with, there are numerous reasons why over-packaging of materials should be banned, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that it pollutes the climate. In addition, it increases the prices of a product exponentially. To illustrate, food restaurants such as Macdonald or Pizza Hut uses extra paper to contain their material which results in increased wastage and rising pollution levels. Also, producers charge the unncessary customer for the extra packaging. Pollution and Over-pricing, therefore, are just a few undesirable results of over-packaging and manufactures should be held responsible for these issues.
On the other hand, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that over-packaging is the entire responsibility of producers, and consumers cannot avoid it. For example, despite observing the devastating impacts of global warming around the world, people still does not raise any concern regarding the extra paper or plastic used in packing the items. Some individuals believe that government or producers should only contemplate on this petty issue and does not bother to raise questions. Irresponsible behavior and unawareness, therefore, play a pivotal role in over-packaging.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that producers, as well as consumers both, should take the responsibility of consciously using or making the products.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-10 | heemagupta | 77 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | heemagupta | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | maniram vicky | 72 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | raavi sandhu | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | Ekta shah | 77 | view |
- Violence portrayed on TV and the movies lead to an increase in crime in our society. People who watch violent movies are more likely to become criminals. Do you agree or disagree? 80
- When computers first appeared on the scene, it was thought they would make us more productive in providing goods and services, smarter and possibly happier. Skeptics believe that the opposite is true as the computer has proved disappointing in terms of pr 77
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing, is this a curse or blessing? 77
- Homeschooling is better when compared to the traditional schooling methods—agree or disagree? 77
- Are people spending too much time at work? Discuss your views on this topic. People spending too much time at their workplaces has become a major issue to tackle. Either due to the work pressure or due to attitude issues and extreme behavior patterns like 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, regarding, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, such as, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63851351351 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30209657098 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611486486486 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1027379594 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.214285714 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7857142857 7.25397266985 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284607524446 0.242375264174 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0893835478283 0.0925447433944 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608893716142 0.071462118173 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159836589902 0.151781067708 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267742856403 0.0609392437508 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 12.6369458128 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.