Do you think consumers should avoid over-packaged products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience.
We have seen a transformation in the packaging of products in the last few decades. Instead of using a single layer of wrappers, companies decide to make use of multiple layers of packaging. This decision is not only unbeneficial for customers but also wastes resources and puts a strain on the environment; thus, manufacturers should be liable for the reduction of over-packaging.
It is justifiable for companies to over-packaged products the way they do. After all, pretty and careful packaging is pivotal and conducive to effective marketing strategies of their products. Nevertheless, it poses as a disadvantage for consumers financially because it significantly and unnecessarily inflates the products’ prices. Ultimately, the goal of the consumers is still to find good products with reasonable prices. As an example, instead of packaging the burgers in a single wrapper, KFC puts our wrapped burgers in a box and puts the box inside a large paper bag. These extra layers are there because a box within a bag is more appealing than just a rumpled piece of paper. Whether this fact is conspicuous to the customers or not, it undoubtedly shoots up the prices of the burgers by at least a few dollars.
Another complication over-packaging causes is the environmental damage. If not done thoroughly, the decomposition of these wrappers increases carbon dioxide emission, which adversely affects the earth’s ecosystem and, inevitably, our survival. Therefore, I subscribe to the view that companies should make minimal use of packaging. Hence, in my opinion, it is, in some sense, more the responsibility of the manufacturers than the consumers.
It is imperative that manufacturer curtail their use of packages. On the other hand, as purchasers, we should also refrain from using over-packaged products in protection of our rights as well as the environment we live in.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-21 | gobindh Singh | 72 | view |
2019-12-05 | manraj123 | 11 | view |
2018-04-08 | omer.cinpir | 77 | view |
2018-03-25 | Benzi | 85 | view |
2018-03-14 | Danielee Goncalves | 77 | view |
- Extreme sports like skiing, rafting, diving should be banned. Agree or disagree? 77
- Extreme sports like skiing, rafting, diving should be banned. Agree or disagree? 72
- Do you think consumers should avoid over-packaged products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience. 77
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, well, after all, at least, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30769230769 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37275341506 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588628762542 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 4.6157635468 238% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2105495794 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1875 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6875 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4375 7.25397266985 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 2.91625615764 309% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194140052663 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649003839495 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608930482319 0.071462118173 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109938575538 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323644330755 0.0609392437508 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.