Government should reduce their investment in
arts, music and painting. Agree or Disagree.
The importance of reducing investments in art, music and painting was always a debatable topic. Many people argue that it would lead to myriad of concerns. In my opinion, I completely disagree with the statement and this step should be rejected. The following essay would further elaborate the reasons why government should not reduce investing in fine arts with clear reasons and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To begin with, one of the main debate going in today's world is the decreasing the financial budget by the government for the development of fine arts including painting and music. The most preponderant fact is that these various forms of art are vital for the growth of nation, therefore, need government support to survive and thrive in the country. Not only music and painting induce discipline but can also give them chance to grow in these field nationally as well as internationally.
Secondly, arts have a vital connection with the cultural identity of the nation. If an art disappears, the whole way of life will disappear with it and will lose the rich cultural diversity. Another pivotal aspect of the argument is that music and painting are two varied medium of expressing the emotions and this sector deserve the investment to acquire desired development. For example, Australian government has invested 30% of its budget for the supporting the fine arts in the year 2017. As a result, improvement in people artistic has increased from 10% to 40%. This example exemplifies us why many people are in favor of dedicating the hefty amount of money in fine arts.
According to the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out to conclusion that the benefits of investing in the field of art are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | jashan randhawa | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | manraj123 | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | gobindh Singh | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | gobindh Singh | 77 | view |
- Government should reduce their investment in arts music and painting Agree or Disagree 86
- Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books. Experimental learning or traditional learning in high school and university, Which one do you agree is more effective? 77
- People are moving to urban areas from rural areas for better life What do you think about 81
- In academic studies, grouping students according to academic abilities is good or not good? Give your opinion? 77
- Some universities deduct marks from students works if given in late what are your views and what action will you recommend to take 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00341296928 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81173989847 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580204778157 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0045418092 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.714285714 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.25397266985 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162614628863 0.242375264174 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542565341438 0.0925447433944 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562195861072 0.071462118173 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981904474751 0.151781067708 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582054380329 0.0609392437508 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.