It is a foolish idea to get married before finishing the study and settling down. To what extent do you agree to disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of study before marriage and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that education is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that completing studies before getting married can be considered as a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, university and study can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that financial management as well as responsibility and maturity, are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered further education helps people to be more responsible and finding well-paid and rewarding jobs in the future. Thus, the beneficial consequences of both being mature and economy planning apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of marriage, early age marriage before graduating might increase the consequences of family breakdowns. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of joblessness related to this reality that the demerit supporting their expenses pertain to less solid education. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of early marriage is correlated negatively with successful marital life. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of education role in maturity and successful marriage.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of study before marriage far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of education prove the significance of financial management and maturity, but also pinpoint career implications.
- You are applying for a job and need a letter of reference Write a letter to formal teacher In your letter Give detail of the job Explain why it is important to you Suggest what information your teacher could out in the reference 91
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc. and whether you support them or not. 85
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc. and whether you support them or not. 11
- For a successful company, selling products depends more on company's reputation or it depends more on if they provide discount and free offers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 85
- can change human behaviour. Do you agree or not? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76363636364 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21264855591 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643636363636 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8665207004 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.083333333 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0925802902712 0.242375264174 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0336023161874 0.0925447433944 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439639492997 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0596785275354 0.151781067708 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471913869554 0.0609392437508 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.7 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.