Many companies involve employees in decision making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?

Nowadays, it is highly recommended to involve employees in key decision meetings, which attracted numerous controversies and drawn the attention from the public. It can be agreed that for the welfare of the company it is good to consider all level employees in critical meetings, while on the other hand stands a perspective that it’s not good to do so. This essay will elaborate on both sides and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.

At the outset, there are numerous reasons why involving middle-level employees is not better option and the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that majority of the employees are working directly with the client. As an illustration, Infosys have involved trainees in the important decisions meeting. In addition, those people daily interact with the client and that helps them to understand what exactly the customer requirement. Thus, it is a good practice to consider employees in decision making meetings.

Nevertheless, there remain some drawbacks, which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of involving workers in important meetings, and the most alarming one is rooted in the fact that some decisions must be taken against low performing employees. For instance, most of the leading multi-national companies have performance appraisal to judge individuals’ performance. In addition, in these meetings top level management takes hard decision against low performing meeting. Thus, it is not good to involve them in all meetings.

In light of discussion above, it can be concluded that the impact of involving employees in management decision is prominent and the way involving them and getting the best from low level employees from these meetings should be well handled.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
PTE_Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommended involving'.
Suggestion: recommended involving
Nowadays, it is highly recommended to involve employees in key decision meetings, whi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
nevertheless, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39416058394 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0147841091 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536496350365 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 440.1 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.9949493017 50.4703680194 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.166666667 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229197963249 0.242375264174 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828041313037 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412412736125 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137930783479 0.151781067708 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273338704119 0.0609392437508 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.