Many people believe that the increasing number of cars in cities is the biggest source of pollution and waste. Others think that industries are the ones causing pollution. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in masses believe that the main source of pollution is a sudden increase in private vehicles like cars, scooter, bike and etcetera, but there are other people who think that industries also contribute to pollution. There is a widespread worry that this will lead to a myriad of concerns in civilian life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favour of stance. The most preponderant one is that using a private transport mode like cars, are the easiest way to go one place to another, but it is also a little bit cause of noise pollution, but these modes can not only contribute to CO2 but also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to a wide range of advantage it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting their chance of prosperity is concerned.
There are, however, some pitfalls that can easily overwhelm potential benefits of industries which give a job facility, but these are the main source of global warming which cannot be ignored and these also lead to water pollution as well as air pollution which directly affects our environment. Besides its impact on soil pollution are far-reaching indeed. However, it is apparent why many are against industrialisation.
In view of the arguments outlined above, we can easily conclude that despite the uses of cars, industries are the source of pollution, which can not be ignored at any cost.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-09 | lovepreet1124 | 77 | view |
- Medical technology can increase life expectancy. Is it a blessing or curse? 77
- Experience is more effective and useful than books and formal education. To what extent do you agree with this opinion? 77
- There are more and more situations using credit cards instead of cash. It seems that cashlesssociety is becoming a reality. How realistic do you think it is ? And do you think it bringsbenefits or problems? 80
- Some people point that experiential learning (i.e. learning by doing it) can work well informal education. However, others think a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do youthink experiential learning is beneficial in high schools or colleges? 85
- There are more and more situations using credit cards instead of cash. It seems that cashlesssociety is becoming a reality. How realistic do you think it is ? And do you think it bringsbenefits or problems? 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
... one place to another, but it is also a little bit cause of noise pollution, but these mod...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1452.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7295827927 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 474.3 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.931034482759 537% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 95.2270015184 50.4703680194 189% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2727272727 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 7.25397266985 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197875916873 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631826156177 0.0925447433944 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627578624185 0.071462118173 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112186981254 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300430351126 0.0609392437508 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.1260098522 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.5310837438 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.