Many people think that regions affect a successful person. What is your opinion about native region and accomplished person’s influence on the region he belongs to?
Recently, the phenomenon of significant influences of the environment where a person has grown up and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that living place is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that effects of neighborhoods can be a pulse, and I will analyze it throughout this essay.
From the sociological standpoint, acquiring good guidance from the neighbors can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the peer pressure, as well as mutual relations, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered achieving goals and targets more easily. Thus, beneficial ramifications of being a precursor to success and breakthrough apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of psychological science, a slum area might increase the consequence of juvenile delinquency and petty crimes. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of the impression of native regions relate to this reality that the demerits of marginal impacts pertain to unsustainable society. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of lack of proper is correlated negatively with attitude influence. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of N.
To conclude, there are several compelling arguments on both sides. I profoundly believe that benefits of being consistent and determined far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only the advantages of capability prove the significance of ambition, motivation, and most importantly hard work, but also pinpoint inborn talents implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-10 | viviana | 55 | view |
| 2019-06-19 | Sidra018 | 85 | view |
| 2019-04-22 | Rajnikant Chauhan | 77 | view |
| 2019-02-20 | Rohit mahajan | 55 | view |
| 2018-09-13 | sara malla | 85 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64598540146 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.323639491 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 139.433497537 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.682481751825 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7905935138 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0696852205986 0.242375264174 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0187686665544 0.0925447433944 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349351987105 0.071462118173 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0336523485945 0.151781067708 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277967164553 0.0609392437508 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 12.6369458128 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.19 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 55.0591133005 205% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.