Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this tech-savvy era as technology is developing in all fields medical fields also improved with latest medical treatment. Some people believe that medical technology helps to live long life is blessing while others argue that it is a curse to the people. I believe that medical technology is the boom for the people. The reasons are people can live long.
To begin with, with this advanced medicines people are improving their health to live for more years. The medicines and advanced equipments for sugary increased life of people. According to the survey conducted by the health department concluded that from the last ten years the expectancy of life is increased tremendously and death rates are decreased with 10%.
Secondly, people can learn aged people experiences and immemorial times of them. In many institutions the aged people are the book of knowledge for the junior to learn the work from them. For example, in my industry have senior employee above 50 years of age. So, junior employees can learn from them. Advanced medical care help people to gain knowledge in many ways.
To conclude, there are massive advantages with advanced medical care and aged people are role model in many fields. I completely agree with the advanced technology is the blessing for the human kind.
- which should require more financial support from the government health or education. To what extent to you agree or disagree. 77
- Some people argue Laws changes human behavior whereas some disagree. Do you agree with it? Argumentative / persuasive/ opinionated type essay. 55
- Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss pros and cons 75
- Sports and games create disturbance in student s life because students cannot fully concentrate on their studies To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- There are social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. What forms do they take? Do you agree that the problems outweigh the benefits of mobile phones? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the latest'.
Suggestion: with the latest
...all fields medical fields also improved with latest medical treatment. Some people believe ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nior employee above 50 years of age. So, junior employees can learn from them. Ad...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1087.0 1207.87684729 90% => OK
No of words: 215.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05581395349 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52798292605 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 139.433497537 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511627906977 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 342.9 379.143842365 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2308375369 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.6428571429 104.977214359 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3571428571 20.9669160288 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 7.25397266985 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165661398023 0.242375264174 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701305681944 0.0925447433944 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680786190538 0.071462118173 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111277011137 0.151781067708 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528896377299 0.0609392437508 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 12.6369458128 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.1260098522 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 11.5310837438 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.32886699507 91% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 55.0591133005 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.