The medical technology is responsible for increasing the average life expectancy. Do youthink it is a curse or a blessing?

Essay topics:

The medical technology is responsible for increasing the average life expectancy. Do you

think it is a curse or a blessing?

One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in people thought that the average life expectancy is increasing through the medical technology so there is ongoing argument between masses that it a curse or blessing. There is a widespread that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one’s life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.

There are a number of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that engineers and scientists are working together in the field of medical technology and they developed medical machines which cannot only contribute to folks life expectancy, but also numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand in one good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.

Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned proposition is that it is only likely to help one thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides, when one follows such a system can they broaden their horizons, thus learning such essential attributes as responsibility, dedication and perseverance. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favour of medical technology because they think that it is increasing the life of people.

In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of medical technology are indeed too great to ignore.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-22 lovepreet1124 85 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user lovepreet1124 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0625 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87414187208 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569852941176 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.4540966775 50.4703680194 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.181818182 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 7.25397266985 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187501814047 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675460745952 0.0925447433944 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079596088651 0.071462118173 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111979856597 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442469780674 0.0609392437508 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.