“More information available online so library books are useless.” Agree or disagree with statement?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trend to see prodigies discussing the fact that in this contemporary world, due to availability of online reading materials, printed books have lost their importance. Critics, however calim that reading library books is the traditional method of learning so it has it’s own importance. I, personally believe former argument is more realistic and worth to believe. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the key features of this statement before deducing any conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriad of arguments discussing the facts that introduction of E-books are responsible to diminish the traditional trend of reading printed books. Firstly, the most conspicuous one stem from the fact that now a days, reading hard copy of books has largely been replaced by online reading material. In addition, this facility is also available in certain renowned libraries to provide students the best possible option. As a prime example, just like other developed nations, Australia has followed the trend of using E-books in primary schools to facilitate children.
Another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that despite all these advancements, way of reading printed books has its own importance. Moreover, some people believe that this is the more traditional and reliable way to grasp maximum knowledge. Therefore, besides using technological friendly E- books, printed books are also available in libraries and any where else to study.
To recapitulate, foregoing discussion propounds that online reading material is the need of today's world and the traditional ways of reading has it own importance. Therefore, ideas that will bring benefit would be cordially welcomed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | MehdiKhodadadi | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | MehdiKhodadadi | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
| 2019-12-20 | yasamin.gharib62 | 80 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | English time | 77 | view |
- In developing countries, tourism has disadvantages or advantages? 77
- Should library use digital gadgets to provide information on different topics? Pros & Cons 80
- “More information available online so library books are useless.” Agree or disagree with statement? 85
- The belching and unauthorized behaviour is unacceptable in modern offices How far you support this view Give your response with justification 91
- In town and cities the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop Do you agree or disagree 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 453, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...lieve. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the key features of this statement before d...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...conspicuous one stem from the fact that now a days, reading hard copy of books has largely...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...picuous one stem from the fact that now a days, reading hard copy of books has largely...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 540, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ustralia has followed the trend of using E-books in primary schools to facilitate...
^^
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: ANY_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anywhere'?
Suggestion: anywhere
...oks are also available in libraries and any where else to study. To recapitulate, fore...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that online reading material is the need of todays world and the traditional ways...
^^
Line 7, column 150, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'owns'?
Suggestion: owns
... the traditional ways of reading has it own importance. Therefore, ideas that will ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, however, moreover, so, therefore, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 271.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46863468635 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88879694782 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586715867159 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8420885872 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84615384615 7.25397266985 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154743598674 0.242375264174 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543709605216 0.0925447433944 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564847916579 0.071462118173 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0918440978264 0.151781067708 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523461170169 0.0609392437508 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.