ome people work for the same organisation all their working lives. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations.
Argue which position you favour, giving your opinion, supported with evidence from your experience.
We all work to earn and live a decent lifestyle. While many prefer to work for the same organization all their lives while others plan to work for a variety of companies. This essay will discuss the benefits of working in one organization and argue that a variety of organizations provides an interesting and satisfying approach to work.
Firstly, working with the same company provides consistency and stability to develop strong skills and relationships. It is also possible to study, upgrade the skills and grow in the company. For example, any professional will develop strong bonds with the clients by serving the company for a long term which will fuel his career growth. Also, it is a win-win situation for the company and an individual. As the organization gets a stable workforce and the employee gets to learn and grow in the company.
On the other hand, some of us like to shift jobs frequently in quest of better career prospects and salaries. Additionally, it helps in tasting variety of work environments and enhances the learning experience. For example, a teacher like to teach in a variety of places such as schools, colleges, universities, private tuitions in order to find the appropriate place of education. Thus, not working for one organization for life may be comfortable for others.
This essay has argued that although a single organization may provide opportunities to specialize, it may be restricting. In my opinion, variety is important in career but working in the same company will help in developing into a specialist.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2017-09-11 | email2singhn | 72 | view |
- Some employers want to be able to contact their staff at all times, even on holidays.Does this development have more disadvantages than advantages? 56
- As computers translate quickly and accurately learning foreign languages is a waste of time To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree 25
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think it is acceptable to use animal for the benefits of humans. Other people think it is wrong to exploit animals for human purposes. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, so, thus, while, for example, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1311.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10116731518 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03665026524 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540856031128 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 410.4 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6569190901 50.4703680194 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6428571429 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.25397266985 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292815052553 0.242375264174 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101830723813 0.0925447433944 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816563483432 0.071462118173 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177768357544 0.151781067708 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735926629637 0.0609392437508 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.