people use more credit cards
The importance of people use more credit cards which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that they can use in a cashless society people use more credit cards. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that credit cards are more useful in daily life and cash are less useful for people life. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects is that credit cards is a very beneficial for any people’s life. Besides, credit card is a plastic card they can use easily to any time because of a no worry of any time. Hence, it is apparent why many are against of this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of in a cashless society people use more credit cards are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-31 | Behnaz fallah | 88 | view |
| 2021-07-23 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 88 | view |
| 2021-07-23 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 85 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | MojtabaKarami | 80 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | MojtabaKarami | 85 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, if, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1156.0 1207.87684729 96% => OK
No of words: 239.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83682008368 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54975522919 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 139.433497537 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535564853556 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 375.3 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4249440538 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.090909091 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7272727273 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.529862683304 0.242375264174 219% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.20391081261 0.0925447433944 220% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.182893071714 0.071462118173 256% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.371853786291 0.151781067708 245% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659077898247 0.0609392437508 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.5310837438 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 55.0591133005 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.