Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of the ambivalence over this matter, whether teachers, doctors, and nurses should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities. Whereas some people agree with the thought, but I sanguinely believe that they should not be paid more than celebrities. This essay will further discuss reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriads of reasons to support this notion, but one of the most compelling reason is that poor class is more depended on their services. If they are paid out more than sports and entertainment personalities then their services will become unaffordable, which will be bad for the society. Hence, the Doctors, nurses, and teachers should not be paid more than celebrities.
On the contrary, skeptics conjecture that professional works like doctors, nurses, and teachers make a greater contribution to the society. Hence, they should be paid more than the sports and entertainment personalities. Although it seems ostensibly veridical, this is a one-sided view. Whereas entertainment is an option for people, doctors, nurses, and teachers are the social requirement. Hence, their services should be priced within the reach of people.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments from both the side, I profoundly believe that the benefits of low-cost services of doctors, nurses, and teachers far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of their low-cost service prove its significance, but also pinpoints implications of the rise in the price of their services.
- Some people believe laws change human behavior. Do you agree with it? 80
- As E-books are available online these days, the value of printed books has diminished. Agree or disagree? 77
- Some say that music, art and drama are as important as other school subjects,especially at the primary level.Do you agree or disagree? 77
- As people become increasingly more dependent on motorcars, the public transport systems tend to run down. This has serious consequences on both the existing community and the new communities, which are spreading farther and farther from town centres.Suppo 80
- Some people think history has nothing or little to tell us, but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present. 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, then, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.390625 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95523238299 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 139.433497537 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5234375 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 407.7 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 0.931034482759 859% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8835198407 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.153846154 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6923076923 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 7.25397266985 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346608959212 0.242375264174 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135371380119 0.0925447433944 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117688484131 0.071462118173 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210206559444 0.151781067708 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104348485157 0.0609392437508 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.