Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trend to see prodigies discussing the fact that government should build more roads to allow more vehicles on roads. Critics, however, claim that it’s better for nation to improve the public transport network for efficient outcome. I, personally think that later statement is more realistic and worth to believe. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the benefits of improving public transport networks to support my view point before deducing any conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriad of argument discussing the fact that public transport is more cheap and healthy option to travel from one place to another. Firstly, the most conspicuous one stem from the fact public transport generally follow time table, while traveling from one to another station. Therefore, it allows us to manage the time accordingly. Moreover, stations are usually fixed for public transports and passengers should follow the routine scheduel. public transport is the best solution to reduce the contribution of global warming. As a prime example, in western nations, strategies are applied to raise the fuel cost and introduction of affordable fairs of public transport for passengers to reduce congestion of private vehicles and avoid emission of burnt fuel and noise pollution.
On the other hand, another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that public transport promotes the healthy life style, which includes walking distance to specific stations and punctuality.
To recapitulate, foregoing discussion propounds that public transport is far better option to adapt for routine traveling than personal cars. Thus, ideas that will bring benefits would be cordially welcomed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-17 | lovedeepkaur2000 | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Shruti gupta radhika | 85 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | manpreet9999 | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-09 | vahora juber | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | prabhdyal | 11 | view |
- Should library use digital gadgets to provide information on different topics? Pros & Cons 85
- . Technological access to online music and the like should be free or paid. What do you think? 80
- Do you think the school should have curriculum asking students to play old drama and work for theatre centuries ago? 77
- Should library use digital gadgets to provide information on different topics? Pros & Cons 80
- Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...however, claim that it's better for nation to improve the public transport n...
^^
Line 1, column 402, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...lieve. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the benefits of improving public transport ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ordingly. Moreover, stations are usually fixed for public transports and passeng...
^^
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...usually fixed for public transports and passengers should follow the routine sch...
^^
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Public
...ers should follow the routine scheduel. public transport is the best solution to reduc...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48880597015 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71254798554 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60447761194 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1419891039 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.153846154 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374996890599 0.242375264174 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115847987953 0.0925447433944 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0949890357898 0.071462118173 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196079365483 0.151781067708 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.166184131972 0.0609392437508 273% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 55.0591133005 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.