Should people avoid over packaged products? Or is it the responsibility of manufactures?
Currently it has become a popular trend that lots of products are rapped and covered with fabulous packaging. The issues about over-packaging products, which is always debatable, has now become more controversial. This essay will discuss why I think manufactures should avoid over-packaging, along with some examples to support my statement.
some people may argue that over packaged products increase the premium value of products. These products represent a high class social status of buyers. Additionally, people prefer to send over packaged products as gifts to show their respect to the receivers.
However, at the outset, lots of manufacturers over charge about products due to its fabulous packaging, which is meaningless for consumers. The reason is while choosing products, the primary factor that consumers will consider is its intrinsic value, which means the value of the products should be equal to its price. Moreover, packaging is useless since it is simply a cover for the product. For instance, researchers show that ninety percent of people will throw the package into rubbish bin at the second they buy products. At the end, the over packaging products only cause more wastes which is not environmentally friendly.
Considering all the substantial insights that are outline above, the conclusion is that packaged products is meaningless in the price and not environmentally friendly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-18 | yasamin.gharib62 | 11 | view |
| 2019-01-15 | christinaxxxue | 80 | view |
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. what are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 80
- employment and studing is distract with one another. To what exent you agree 55
- Should people avoid over packaged products? Or is it the responsibility of manufactures? 80
- Some people thinks that native regions has impact the success. Discuss about your view. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...e examples to support my statement. some people may argue that over packaged pro...
^^^^
Line 6, column 24, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...receivers. However, at the outset, lots of manufacturers over charge about ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, second, so, while, for instance, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1201.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 218.0 242.827586207 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50917431193 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99029445949 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 139.433497537 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605504587156 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 379.143842365 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3712284594 50.4703680194 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.083333333 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1666666667 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.25397266985 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405878098398 0.242375264174 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145351008051 0.0925447433944 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695283487767 0.071462118173 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233001231919 0.151781067708 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778748742248 0.0609392437508 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.