Should there be a variety of learning methodologies implemented within the school learning curriculum? Or Discuss the types of teaching methods and their advantages and disadvantages.
In recent times, schools have brought many changes in the way they teach their students. They are adopting various methods of teachings and learning. Though there are advantages of having multiple ways of teaching, disadvantages do come along as well. In this essay, I will discuss the pros and cons of the new ways of learning.
There are positive implications of implementing prolific methods of learning. As there will be multiple ways of learning a particular subject, it will improve the understanding for the students. Also, it will be aid the student to opt for the one that would best suit for them resulting in a happy learning.
On the contrary, having lots of learning techniques will have its drawbacks. For example, when a student learns the same subject in multiple ways it could lead to confusion.
In conclusion, schools should practice multiple methodologies of teaching and learning as the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-04 | shankaraviji | 73 | view |
- The traditional subjects are soon moving off since last few years in schools. Kindly provide the solutions and ideas to save such subjects. 61
- Governments should reduce their investments in arts, music, and painting. Do you agree or disagree? 55
- Student travel to study is overrated, we have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really required for higher studies? 80
- Trying to save endangered species from extinction is a waste of valuable resources, do you agree or disagree? 11
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is YOUR opinion? Support it with personal examples. 55
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 31.9359605911 63% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.75862068966 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 804.0 1207.87684729 67% => OK
No of words: 154.0 242.827586207 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22077922078 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.92707691288 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96670112542 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 139.433497537 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584415584416 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 379.143842365 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.0485153871 50.4703680194 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.4 104.977214359 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4 20.9669160288 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 7.25397266985 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261013289989 0.242375264174 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107457748362 0.0925447433944 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0998966227162 0.071462118173 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184183795196 0.151781067708 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121037206684 0.0609392437508 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 12.6369458128 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.1260098522 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.9458128079 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 55.0591133005 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.