Should wealthy nations help poor countries with food and education, or is it the responsibility of poor nations to improve their condition?
Recently, the phenomenon of wealthy nations help poor countries with food and education and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the responsibility of poor nations to improve their condition can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, helping to poor countries can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, improving poor nations conditions might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the responsibility of poor nations to food and education far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-18 | 3pid | 88 | view |
| 2019-07-11 | bashirheidari | 77 | view |
| 2019-04-05 | mojtaba1980 | 84 | view |
| 2018-10-01 | Mani.Narimani | 85 | view |
| 2018-09-30 | Mani.Narimani | 85 | view |
- Company Top Level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions? Discuss 88
- Parents should be legally responsible for children's act/behavior. What is your opinion? 85
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss 85
- Xvhgv off hrhb and its people and its people and its people
- Young people under the age of 25 have no right to vote and drive due to the lack of experience. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7480620155 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28729017065 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651162790698 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9133418153 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.818181818 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340388800282 0.242375264174 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114000027087 0.0925447433944 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129978117671 0.071462118173 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190894406302 0.151781067708 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11218521603 0.0609392437508 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.96 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.