Should wealthy nations help poor countries with food and education, or is it the responsibility of poor nations to improve their condition?
Recently, helping wealthy nations to poor countries has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “Is it the responsibility of poor nations to better their conditions?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that the assistance of developed countries would be an effective way to improve developing countries, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the socio-economic standpoint, international assistance is bound up inextricably with developing the poor nation, which indicates they lead to both the better world and globalization. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between developed countries and international interaction as well as an exponential increase in collective work. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of being an industrialized country is correlated positively with not only improving the global economy but also the elimination of the poverty.
Within the realm of the humanitarian aspects, without the slightest doubt, wealthy nations attribute to responsibilities, in that it would come down to poverty, social inequality, and unemployment situations. A salient example of such attribution is natural disasters, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take human rights for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint underprivileged people life problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of wealthy notions in developing countries.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that developing countries should improve their situation with the assistance of wealthy nations. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-05 | mojtaba1980 | 84 | view |
| 2018-10-01 | Mani.Narimani | 85 | view |
| 2018-09-30 | Mani.Narimani | 85 | view |
- Cities are now expanding; the government should make the better network for public transport or should building more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or disagree? 77
- It has recently been suggested that the classical, or "dead", languages Latin and Greek should be re- introduced into the school curriculum. Those that oppose the idea claim that the ancient languages are of no practical use and no help in getting a job 88
- Some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion 88
- In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory. Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting? If voting is compulsory in a democratic society, what are come conclusions we can draw about the nature of democracy? 85
- Whether the design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...oes 'all's well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.91666666667 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46359344503 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 139.433497537 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663194444444 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.2973828534 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.909090909 104.977214359 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1818181818 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301230977578 0.242375264174 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932202215122 0.0925447433944 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117677308658 0.071462118173 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168369155979 0.151781067708 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105756153632 0.0609392437508 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 12.6369458128 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.35 11.5310837438 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.85 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.94827586207 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.