Some people argue that experience is the best teacher. Life experiences can teach more effectively than books or formal school education. How far do you agree with this idea? Support your opinion with reasons and/or your personal experience
In recent times, there has much been a colossal upsurge in the trend to see prodigies discussing teaching modes via experience and academic education. Although it is a matter of discussion, I tend to believe that learning through practical experience is way better than reading books and formal education.
Firstly, there are a myriad of reasons in favor of my notion but the conspicuous one is that by own experience, not only one can have an enormous capacity to understand and remember but also deliver quickly whenever is needed. For instance, a friend of mine can easily solve any problem which is experienced by him at least once. Hence it is evident why experience can teach in a more effective way.
Moreover, practical life experience gives more confidence and ability to understand out of the box. that means, the more we focus in our real life, the more we grab instinctively and used whenever is required. For example, teachers become more knowledgeable as their experience grow to teach children. Apparently, the country can stand in a good sted with better literacy rate.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that rich live experience is effective than formal education which is indeed too great to ignore.
- In less developedcountries, are the disadvantages from tourism as great as the advantages? 62
- Some people point that experiential learning (i.e. learning by doing it) can work well in formal education. However, others think a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you think experiential learning can work well in high schools or colleges? 77
- Some people point that experiential learning (i.e. learning by doing it) can work well in formal education. However, others think a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you think experiential learning can work well in high schools or colleges? 80
- Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree. 11
- Some SCHOOLS believe that CHILDREN should learn typing rather than a good handwriting How far do you agree with that Show reasons with your experience 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 22, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...rmal education. Firstly, there are a myriad of reasons in favor of my notion but th...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ch is experienced by him at least once. Hence it is evident why experience can teach ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
...d ability to understand out of the box. that means, the more we focus in our real li...
^^^^
Line 5, column 379, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a good sted with better literacy rate. In view of the arguments outlined above,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, so, at least, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 1207.87684729 87% => OK
No of words: 208.0 242.827586207 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03365384615 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79739946861 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649038461538 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 379.143842365 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5850852802 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.7 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9 7.25397266985 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299375980824 0.242375264174 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113147162551 0.0925447433944 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625711101324 0.071462118173 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164201848379 0.151781067708 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341363103372 0.0609392437508 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 55.0591133005 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.