Some people claim that public transportation should be free of charge. Do you agree?

Essay topics:

Some people claim that public transportation should be free of charge. Do you agree?

Recently, the phenomenon of public transportation and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of air transportation is highly beneficial, such isuue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial individuals. I am inclined to believe that free transportation can be a plus, and I will examine that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the transportation system can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that charging public transportation, as well as road transportation, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of transportation. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and free transportation apparently cab be seen.
Within the realm of science, public transportation systems might increase the consequences of cultured people. Moreover, unique aspects of road transportation relate to this reality that the demerits of international transportation pertain to free national transportation. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of using public transportation is correlated negatively with changing transportation systems. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of free of charge transportation.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of free transportation systems far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of developing public transportation prove the significance of modern transportation systems, but also pinpoint clever people implications.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-16 richierich25 77 view
2019-11-12 maniram vicky 69 view
2019-10-04 Roshanip 55 view
2019-10-04 Roshanip 55 view
2019-10-04 Roshanip 61 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 280, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'individual'?
Suggestion: individual
...itive and constructive by a substantial individuals. I am inclined to believe that free tra...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 5.75862068966 399% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 6.04942965779 5.00649968141 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.77947915629 2.71678728327 139% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608365019011 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.689492364 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.583333333 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274037727666 0.242375264174 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098381317299 0.0925447433944 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519382492141 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167071285085 0.151781067708 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295186745975 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.81 11.5310837438 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.