Some people indicate that certain kind of music can promote learning for young children, while many researchers showed that results are mixed. What is your opinion? Use your own experience and observation.
Recently the effect of music on the children's learning has sparked an ongoing controversy, which leads to a moot question " Do people have a correct indication in spite of mixed results?". Whereas, it is a widely held view that a certain kind of music can promote learning for young children. I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, learning improvements are bound up with cognitive skills, which indicates they lead to both musical environments and creativities. As a well-known example, a study conducted by scientists in 2016 demonstrates the relationship between academic performances and folk music as well as an exponential increase in practical courses. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of music instruments is correlated positively with not only altering moods but also educational developments.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, the learning atmosphere attribute to the instrumental music, in that it would come down to the team working, relaxing, and sense of peace. A salient example of such attribution is depressions, which is a cause of concern since it was mistaken to take talented students for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars have had the opportunity to pinpoint the orchestra problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to positive energies, artistic concepts, and even social skills. Hence, it is correct to infer the pivotal role of music in promoting children's learning process.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I believe that certain kind of music can amplify the cognitive process for children. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-14 | brandnewiman | 58 | view |
| 2018-11-10 | belayet | 76 | view |
- As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportationavailable for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or expe 88
- The cashless society is becoming a reality. More and more people are using credit cards for payment, and fewer people use cash. How realistic do you think it is? And do you think it is beneficial or problematic? 77
- Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree? 80
- Do you think English will remain to be a global language despite globalization? 88
- In order to study effectively, it requires comfort, peace and time. So it is impossible for a student to combine learning and employment at the same time. Do you think this is realistic in our life today? To what extent do you agree with this statement? S 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 659, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...f music in promoting childrens learning process. To conclude, as for myself, as the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, even so, kind of, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5652173913 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13709165575 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 139.433497537 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648829431438 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3313190521 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.857142857 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.25397266985 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218169821834 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683014963162 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878919191876 0.071462118173 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132613140824 0.151781067708 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0758763930092 0.0609392437508 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.