Cashless society is becoming a reality. More and more people are using credit cards for payment, and less people use cash. How realistic do you think it is and what do you see in its potential benefits and problems?
Recently, the phenomenon of cashless society has sparked a heated controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "is it advantageous or not?". Whereas, it is a widely held view that using credit cards are becoming more common in society. I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the socio-economic standpoint, credit cards are bound up inextricably with cashless trades, which indicates they lead to both banking systems and online transactions. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2013 demonstrates the relationship between security and safety as well as an exponential increase in economic developments. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of credit accounts is correlated positively with not only financial abilities but also greater shopping experiences.
Within the realm of technology, without the slightest doubt, the e-commerce attribute to online shopping, in that it would come down to deposit cards, global money, and tracing transactions. A salient example of such attribution is faster banking processes, which is a cause of concern since it was mistaken to take traditional money for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars have had the opportunity to pinpoint black markets problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to money laundries, online frauds, and even world bank. Hence, it is correct to infer the pivotal role of the benefits of a cashless world.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the cashless society is a real advantage of technology which has more merits than demerits. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive that the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-12 | Kushi | 72 | view |
| 2019-01-04 | baran.bahrani | 85 | view |
| 2018-11-22 | Cheyi1127 | 55 | view |
| 2018-11-19 | farrukhshafi | 65 | view |
| 2018-11-03 | brandnewiman | 80 | view |
- Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 77
- There are a lot of inventions nowadays, which invention do you think is more important in our day-to-day life. What are the benefits and detrimental effects of it? 77
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 80
- Professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to society and so should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- In order to study effectively, it requires comfort, peace and time. So it is impossible for a student to combine learning and employment at the same time. Do you think this is realistic in our life today? To what extent do you agree with this statement? S 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...'is it advantageous or not?'. Whereas, it is a widely held view that using cr...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...technology, without the slightest doubt, the e-commerce attribute to online shopp...
^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58904109589 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10342760526 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.671232876712 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8973551089 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.538461538 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131063612705 0.242375264174 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431539905308 0.0925447433944 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565922088371 0.071462118173 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0801637022815 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485062548658 0.0609392437508 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.57 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.