Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. Which opinion do you agree with? Discuss both options and give examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of keeping pets and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that it is highly beneficial for people, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the effectiveness of pets can be a plus and I will elaborate this in further essay.
From a social standpoint, keeping pets such as dogs and cats can provide owner of the pets some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of promoting happiness and feeling love, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment on pets which discovered the influence of pets in social life. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both safety of the people and providing a great company apparently can be seen.
From a realm of scientists, keeping animals at home might increase the consequences of serious diseases. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of pets could relate to this reality that the demerits of animals as a pet pertain to extra expense like insurance and food for them. As a tangible example, some academic research undertaken by prestigious university has asserted that the downside of pets is correlated negatively with the risk of health. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of keeping pets far outweigh its drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-25 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | mojtaba1980 | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | manpreet9999 | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | jashan randhawa | 70 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | jashan randhawa | 55 | view |
- If you are assigned to work on climate change what will you choose to focus on and why? 11
- University only requires applying digital media rather than continuously upgrading textbook Agree or disagree 83
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 84
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 88
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additionally funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1337.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2431372549 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06591937136 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607843137255 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8063355962 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.545454545 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 7.25397266985 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177925381615 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06063130371 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0312472557187 0.071462118173 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104176610447 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0166668713846 0.0609392437508 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.