Some people think law changes human behavior. Do you agree or disagree?
In the recent years, the phenomenon of change in human’s behavior according to laws has sparked a heated debate. Although many believe that the matter of changes in the thought is not entirely beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly constructive by a substantial of individuals. In the following essay, I will analyze the changes before deducing a conclusion.
From a social standpoint, laws provide the citizens with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of moral, security, order and so on. For example, Singapore has its laws of banning throwing chewing gums in public places, so Singaporeans are trained to that habit. Where ever they go, they are likely to follow it. In that case, beneficial ramifications of change in the behavior and nation’s development can be seen.
However, strict laws may increase the consequences of zero tolerance and ultimately increases living cost pertain to more taxes. Researchers have found that the downside of more crime rate is correlated negatively with the laws of the country. Despite these drawbacks, governments who are socially responsible should keep on formulating creative laws to protect and guide their citizens.
In conclusion, laws have both positive and negative impacts on human’s behavior. I believe that human nature and throughs are heavily affected by these rules and regulations, and governments should take responsibility on updating these terms for citizen’s well being and behavior.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-11 | Sridarani | 74 | view |
| 2024-04-25 | Rafia Jawad | 55 | view |
| 2024-03-23 | Nina Tsarevich | 77 | view |
| 2024-01-26 | topraveesh | 77 | view |
| 2024-01-24 | topraveesh | 80 | view |
- Many people choose to migrate to other countries. What are the advantages and disadvantages of living in a foreign country? Discuss with your own experience. 85
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- The government should allocate more funding to teaching sciences rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress. To what extent do you agree? 78
- People should take part in sports either in individual or in teams, because people can learn many useful skills. How far do you agree? Explain and use examples or your own experience. 85
- 94
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, well, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1275.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 231.0 242.827586207 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51948051948 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08281039723 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649350649351 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1732359773 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.25 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.25397266985 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194358982027 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708224221854 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587577423869 0.071462118173 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115614494582 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408774535093 0.0609392437508 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.