Some people think that university should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. T what extent do you agree or disagree.
The importance of university should not provide so much theoretical knowledge which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while other reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that university should give more practical knowledge rather than giving so much theoretical knowledge. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that if they give more practical knowledge to student they learn easily. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoints, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects is that theoretical knowledge is not much helpful for students as compared to practical knowledge. Besides, when they do practical work they not forget anything related to study and it is helpful foe student. Hence it is apparent why many are against of this trend.
According to the argument aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of university should not provide so much theoretical knowledge are indeed too great to ignore.
- In under developed countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said opposite as well. give your opinion? 88
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are youngsters role model. Do you support it or not? 77
- The world s governments are organization are facing a lot of issues 77
- Problems and benefits for high school students study plays and work of theatres written centuries ago 88
- government should look forward creating better network 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...to study and it is helpful foe student. Hence it is apparent why many are against of ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at the benefits of university should not provide so much theoretical knowledge ar...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, if, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1238.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 237.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22362869198 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77302839543 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569620253165 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6037882206 50.4703680194 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.545454545 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5454545455 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271308083261 0.242375264174 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960993155352 0.0925447433944 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0944600730858 0.071462118173 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174163942825 0.151781067708 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399703900209 0.0609392437508 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.