Student travel to study is overrated, we have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really required for higher studies?
Recently, the phenomenon of travelling for study and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the decision of travelling for higher education is highly beneficial for students, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the effectiveness of travelling can be plus and I will elaborate that in this essay.
From a social standpoint, acquiring knowledge and practical exposure can provide the students with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of promoting communication skills as well as encouraging intercultural tolerance and brotherhood, are inextricably bound up. . From my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experience which discovered the influence of traveling on my social and professional life. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of travelling for higher study in terms of increasing awareness about different culture apparently can be seen.
From a realm of education science, the students who travel for tertiary education are more confident and independent as in other countries they have to do most of things own their own. As a tangible example, some academic research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that students also enhance their learning by a wider spectrum of expertise and knowledge. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of travelling for educational purposes is highly beneficial.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly to believe that the education plays a pivotal role in pupil’s life and the benefits for travelling for study are indeed too great to ignore.
- We are becoming increasingly dependent on computers. They are used in businesses, hospitals, crime detection and even to fly planes. What things will they be used for in the future? Is this dependence on computers a good thing or should we be more suspici 88
- University only requires applying digital media rather than continuously upgrading textbook Agree or disagree 83
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 77
- It is important to preserve the beautiful buildings of the past even if it will be expensive to do so. What’s your opinion? 77
- It is important to preserve the beautiful buildings of the past even if it will be expensive to do so. What’s your opinion? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...brotherhood, are inextricably bound up. . From my own experience, when I was a un...
^^
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the things') or simply say ''most things''.
Suggestion: most of the things; most things
...t as in other countries they have to do most of things own their own. As a tangible example, s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54578754579 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25684073323 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611721611722 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.5622173784 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.4 104.977214359 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294880631711 0.242375264174 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114734021561 0.0925447433944 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070678879534 0.071462118173 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173908468979 0.151781067708 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331530848561 0.0609392437508 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.