Student's marks deduction on late submission of assignment. Agree or Disagree.
There is deduction of marks for students who apparently failed to submit their assignments on time. This rule is being imposed by several universities in all the states across Australia. This essay will talk about if this perception is right or wrong.
For students who don’t submit their assignments on time, there is an agony in them that they are denied something. This causes a different feeling in teachers and faculties according to a survey that was conducted in 2015. The teachers started complaining that students are being more reluctant in doing their regular activities on time. It is also difficult for the faculties to cope up with the current schedule because of the defaulters.
On the other hand, students still feel that this is a harsh punishment to them when the faculties deduct the marks. They are complaining that there are some essays which requires more time than what was given. They had to refer to lot of internet websites, books and other documentation for them to complete the assignment in an efficient way.
However in my opinion, I would positively say it is always better to complete the assignments on time. The best thing that a student can do is to do an analysis on the assignment first, put up a plan to see when they can finish it. They can then furnish the plan to the faculties explaining them about the complexity in it and ask for more time to complete.
With all that being said, I would like to conclude saying that having the habit of doing things in time always helps in shaping the student to acheive better and get more satisfying results. Rather than this being imposed a rule, this can be taught to students in an effective way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-28 | gupta-vikas | 62 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | elise1234 | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | Roshanip | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-01 | ker | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-25 | titanic-basnet | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an efficient way" with adverb for "efficient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ion for them to complete the assignment in an efficient way. However in my opinion, I would posi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... the assignment in an efficient way. However in my opinion, I would positively say i...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 262, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective way" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... a rule, this can be taught to students in an effective way.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, first, however, if, so, still, then, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 20.9802955665 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75593220339 5.00649968141 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59579134764 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508474576271 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.9 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.57093596059 89% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.6157635468 217% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.3492636505 50.4703680194 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.5333333333 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.093140389337 0.242375264174 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.036274095836 0.0925447433944 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511790296464 0.071462118173 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0582367620525 0.151781067708 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023676695376 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 12.6369458128 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.1260098522 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.9458128079 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.5310837438 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.32886699507 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.