Student's marks deduction on late submission of assignment. Agree or Disagree.
There is deduction of marks for students who apparently failed to submit their assignments on time. This rule is being imposed by several universities in all the states across Australia. This essay will talk about if this perception is right or wrong.
For students who don’t submit their assignments on time, there is an agony in them that they are denied something. This causes a different feeling in teachers and faculties according to a survey that was conducted in 2015. The teachers started complaining that students are being more reluctant in doing their regular activities on time. It is also difficult for the faculties to cope up with the current schedule because of the defaulters.
On the other hand, students still feel that this is a harsh punishment to them when the faculties deduct the marks. They are complaining that there are some essays which requires more time than what was given. They had to refer to lot of internet websites, books and other documentation for them to complete the assignment in an efficient way.
However in my opinion, I would positively say it is always better to complete the assignments on time. The best thing that a student can do is to do an analysis on the assignment first, put up a plan to see when they can finish it. They can then furnish the plan to the faculties explaining them about the complexity in it and ask for more time to complete. When the work is not done on time, there is a hit on the student’s credibility and also can lead to a situation where the teacher loses his/her hope on the student.
With all that being said, I would like to conclude saying that having the habit of doing things in time always helps in shaping the student to acheive better and get more satisfying results. Rather than this being imposed a rule, this can be taught to students in an effective way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-28 | gupta-vikas | 62 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | elise1234 | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | Roshanip | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-01 | ker | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-25 | titanic-basnet | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an efficient way" with adverb for "efficient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ion for them to complete the assignment in an efficient way. However in my opinion, I would posi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... the assignment in an efficient way. However in my opinion, I would positively say i...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 262, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective way" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... a rule, this can be taught to students in an effective way.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, first, however, if, so, still, then, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.5418719212 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 5.94088669951 252% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 20.9802955665 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 31.9359605911 153% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 327.0 242.827586207 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7125382263 5.00649968141 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62369638048 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501529051988 0.580463131201 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 469.8 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.57093596059 89% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.6157635468 217% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9572612233 50.4703680194 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.3125 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4375 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4375 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111557056504 0.242375264174 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0417967492278 0.0925447433944 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539729818115 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0686051145613 0.151781067708 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0156745468043 0.0609392437508 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 12.6369458128 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.1260098522 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.9458128079 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.5310837438 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.32886699507 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.