Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not? (Agree/Disagree)
Since the beginning of the 21st century, youngsters have chosen different famous people as their role model. Some people believe that successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are considered the role model for the youngsters, while others argue that youngsters prefer scientists and writers as a model. This essay will discuss the reasons why sports stars and films stars are playing a crucial role in the youngsters lives and they are regarded as a role model for them.
Sports stars and films stars are a role model for the youngsters because they are shown on TV and in the newspaper regularly. Photos of famous stars attract the youngsters to consider them as a role model. Recent study, which was conducted in the Cambridge university, has shown that 96% of American people consider Lionel Messi as a role model for them, and they try to act similar to him in their lives. Therefore, it seems clear that successful sports stars and films
stars have a significant impact on the lives of the youngsters.
On the other hand, some people believe that youngsters consider writers and journalists as their role model. They think they express their ideas better than a successful sports players. But these people are unaware of the fact that the percentage of these people is very small when comparing with others who select sports players as their role model. Thus, famous sport players and famous actors act as a role model for the youngsters.
In conclusion, this essay discussed the reason why youngsters consider the sports stars and films stars as a role model for them. In my opinion, I am inclined to believe that sports stars and films stars have a significant influence on the youngsters.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-17 | aminrad | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | NancySood | 72 | view |
| 2018-12-26 | hoandang | 77 | view |
| 2018-08-03 | Fiona Joanna Cruz | 72 | view |
- Television has two roles: to inform and to entertain. Explain which of these roles you see as more important. To what extent do you think that TV today performs each of these roles in an effective way? Support your point of view with details from your own 72
- Team sports are generally promoted as a great way to keep fit and build character. However, sporting events such as soccer matches are often accompanied by violence between rival supporters and other forms of antisocial behavior. If sporting events can le 76
- A recent study has shown that over 50% of school children cannot write legibly. The researchers concluded that the widespread use of smartphones,tablets and computers by children from as young as 12 months old was to blame. We are now living in a “post- 11
- Poverty is a major issue world wide. Many charities exist to help collect monetary donations. Who should decide what the donations are spent on? The people in need or the charitable organizations? 72
- Modern technology is now very common in most work places.How do you think this has changed the way we work?Do you think there are disadvantages to relying too much on technology? 55
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 20.9802955665 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 31.9359605911 69% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.75862068966 17% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93425605536 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48401939736 2.71678728327 91% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 139.433497537 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.42214532872 0.580463131201 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 411.3 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.57093596059 89% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0911682936 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.692307692 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.25397266985 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.464944788839 0.242375264174 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.224506179357 0.0925447433944 243% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133386035168 0.071462118173 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.315712875136 0.151781067708 208% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113654601256 0.0609392437508 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.1260098522 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.32886699507 88% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 55.0591133005 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 58.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.