Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not? (Agree/Disagree)

Essay topics:

Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not? (Agree/Disagree)

It is often argued that victorious sports and movie personalities are set to be good examples for the younger generations. I strongly disagree with the foregoing argument because of the violence these people show and they sometimes act immorally. This essay will discuss my justifications for the stated reasons.

To begin with, actors and actresses are usually required to exhibit obscene behavior on television as well on movies. This sounds true depending on the character they are portraying. As a result, they may be imitated by children most especially if it has instilled in their minds some vivid acts of violence, war and indiscriminate behavior. Thus, celebrities cannot be considered as a good role model for the youth.

Apart from this, various popular athletes do have bad habits as well in reality. News media were able to know personal facts about them such as addiction to illegal drugs and alcohol. With this broadcast information, teenagers may also lead to prohibited acts as these personalities can use their influence to control people. Indeed, the parents should guide their children regarding who to be idolized and those who must not.

To recapitulate, the young generations must be careful to choose who to look after from the famous sports personalities and film actors available on board. Perhaps, it is everyone’s own responsibility to be critical in seeing these kinds of influential people.

Votes
Average: 7.2 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-17 aminrad 11 view
2019-08-31 yasamin.gharib62 88 view
2019-08-07 NancySood 72 view
2018-12-26 hoandang 77 view
2018-08-03 Fiona Joanna Cruz 72 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Fiona Joanna Cruz :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, may, regarding, so, still, thus, well, apart from, such as, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1208.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 229.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27510917031 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00110262404 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.681222707424 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5377833678 50.4703680194 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9230769231 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6153846154 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0824861257585 0.242375264174 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.029215366179 0.0925447433944 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389954320321 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0503459240963 0.151781067708 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254404949513 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.