Talk about an invention that you think beneficial or harmful.
Recently, the phenomenon of "the beneficial or harmful inventions" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that the worldwide Internet might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the invention of the Internet can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the education standpoint, the advent of the Internet can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that distance learning methods and the roles of computers are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of the Internet on medical education. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both the effects of social media and new learning methods distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of physiology, without the slightest doubt, the effects of the Internet might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of the lack of physical activities. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the Internet and computers can relate to the reality that the demerits of the worldwide web can pertain to decreasing exercises. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of modern technologies were correlated positively with the active society, the local authorities would ultimately address the physical effects of the online games on children. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of Artificial Intelligence.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt vigorously to support the idea that the merits of the Internet and computers far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-07 | essay12 | 11 | view |
| 2020-08-04 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2020-07-23 | navneet sidhu | 77 | view |
| 2020-07-13 | Gohar Khan | 89 | view |
| 2020-07-05 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
- The graph bellow shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Which areas of concern should governments allocate funds to Climate change education or public health Explain your idea with examples 85
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- the three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71378091873 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26044836526 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611307420495 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.3094973388 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.0 104.977214359 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7272727273 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0592868189541 0.242375264174 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0226116683696 0.0925447433944 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044695712716 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0322389704846 0.151781067708 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435809340239 0.0609392437508 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 12.6369458128 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.24 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 55.0591133005 207% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.