Today's young generation is becoming more technology savvy day by day. Smartphones and the internet become an essential part of their life but old people have a little chance to be exposed to these new gadgets. We can take some steps to make mobile phone and the internet useful to old people. In the following paragraphs, I will discuss these steps in detail.
First of all, let's talk about how we can make these gadgets or the internet useful to them. We can take the following steps like by developing more apps which work with voice commands. Voice command based map application can be very helpful to old people to find locations. Social media apps are also useful for them to connect with old friends and relatives. They can use the internet to get more useful information.
Secondly, we can encourage them to use this new technology by showing how it can be useful for them. We can explain, that we can do lots of things online nowadays like we can access bank information online without going to the bank, book a train or plane ticket online, and we can pay our bills over the internet etcetera.
To conclude, as discussed in the above paragraphs we can encourage old people to use the new technology by explaining its benefits. And we can make these technologies more user-friendly for old people as well.
- Do you think that the place where the person grew has an influence in his accomplishment? Explain with example. 55
- If Voting Is Compulsory In A Democratic Society, What Conclusions Can We Draw About Nature Of Democracy? 55
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion on this? Do you think this is a good or bad change? 55
- With technology speeding up, more and more young people begin to use mobile phones and the Internet, but old people have little chance to be exposed to them. What ways could mobile phone and the Internet be useful to old people? How can old people be enco 55
- Should University penalize students for late submission of their work 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 1207.87684729 90% => OK
No of words: 232.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7025862069 5.00649968141 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56023960657 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556034482759 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 379.143842365 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5615320548 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.9230769231 104.977214359 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8461538462 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76923076923 7.25397266985 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414538125811 0.242375264174 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166093922084 0.0925447433944 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903976667615 0.071462118173 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279504214787 0.151781067708 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0879682296531 0.0609392437508 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 12.6369458128 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.1260098522 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.9458128079 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 11.5310837438 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.32886699507 88% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 55.0591133005 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.