There are social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. Do you agree that the problem outweigh the benefits of mobile phones?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that there are social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one’s life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that there are social, medical an d technical problems associated use of mobile phone can not only contribute to mobile phone is very dangerous for our eyes and also harmful for birds and animals. But also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned proposition is that it only likely help to one thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides, only when one follows such a system, can they broaden their horizons, thus learning such essential attributes as responsibility, dedication and perseverance. Hence, it is apparent why many are favour of there are social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones.
In view of the argument outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-23 | manpreet9999 | 70 | view |
| 2019-08-23 | manraj123 | 85 | view |
| 2019-08-23 | English time | 79 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 116, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...t one is that there are social, medical an d technical problems associated use of ...
^^
Line 2, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... dangerous for our eyes and also harmful for birds and animals. But also lead to ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95833333333 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76046689332 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513888888889 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 471.6 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5489411232 50.4703680194 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.25397266985 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385148933948 0.242375264174 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145118727199 0.0925447433944 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.187498787242 0.071462118173 262% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274022571363 0.151781067708 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0840270417655 0.0609392437508 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.