Tobacco mainly in the form of cigarettes is one of the most widely used drug in the world. Over a billion adult smoke tobacco everyday. The long term health costs are high- for smokers themselves and and for the wider communities in term of health care cost and lost productivity.
Do governments have a legitimate role to legislate to protect citizens from the harmful effects of their own decisions to smoke, or are such decisions up to the individual?
Smoking has extremely detrimental effects on health. Some people think that governments need to play a pivotal role to protect citizens from smoking, while others maintain that the harmful effects of smoking can only be better understood by the individuals. This essay will discuss that how government should take appropriate measures to discourage and eliminate this habit in its citizens.
Firstly, a large number of people are being attracted to smoke cigarettes. In this regard, governments need to take into account suitable measures to limit the use of cigarettes. As a matter of fact, a smoker not only harms himself but also pollutes the environment and effects the public around. Therefore, to discourage individuals governments should ban smoking cigarettes in public and well as indoor places. This act of government will result in decline of ratio of smokers.
Furthermore, governments need to be instrumental and take into account various measures to curb the trend of smoking. While, extra taxes should be imposed, sale of open or loose cigarettes should be banned too. As as example, in my country sale of loose and open cigarettes has been banned to minimize the trend of smoking. Additionally, a recent survey has revealed that 70% of the patients suffering from heart diseases and heart attacks are smokers. As a result, the role of legislature is of paramount importance to make an individual aware as well demotivated.
In conclusion, aforementioned provide plausible ideas that governments should adapt. This essay has discussed that how governments can minimize the effect and trend of smoking by putting a ban on indoor smoking and increasing the amount of taxes on cigarettes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-07 | ptemaster2018 | 77 | view |
| 2018-04-08 | Anonymous | 11 | view |
- schools should prepare students for universities rather than work. How far do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons / or examples from your experience or observations. 80
- In town and cities the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop Do you agree or disagree 64
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples? 77
- some people believe that it is good to do multiple jobs,while others believe that it is better to focus on one job?Do you agree or disagree?I 67
- A recent trend in the entertainment world is to adapt classic works of literature for either TV or the movies One argument is that this is to everyone s benefit as it introduces people to works they might otherwise never have experienced while others say 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...his habit in its citizens. Firstly, a large number of people are being attracted to smoke cig...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: As
... loose cigarettes should be banned too. As as example, in my country sale of loose an...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29411764706 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95180982253 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525735294118 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.0 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9230800437 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1333333333 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.25397266985 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0538396198102 0.242375264174 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0234409205513 0.0925447433944 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313099114922 0.071462118173 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0370620242082 0.151781067708 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0137555541185 0.0609392437508 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.