Whether design of buildings will have a positive or negative impact on peoples life and work?
Whether design of buildings will have a positive or negative impact on peoples lives and work has always been a debatable topic. A certain group of individuals believes that design of apartments will have a positive impact on both professional career and personal life. In my opinion, I completely agree with the statement that in the modern world, infrastructure plays a key role in every individual life. This essay would further elaborate the reasons why the design of buildings will have the huge influence on real-time examples and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
Firstly, innovative patterns of different buildings motivate the people to work in an organization and enhance creating thinking as they feel working in better infrastructure facility. In the present world, people are more attracted to engage with companies which have proper better facilities. For example, innovative designs and buildings encourage employees to work better and at the same time, it will also increase the productivity of workers which in turn yields good profits and reputation to the organization. This example clearly exemplifies us that there is a correlation between building designs and employee productivity.
Secondly, infrastructure plays a vital role in one's life and health. Modern buildings with good ventilation facilities and good space attribute to the health of people. Few designs have a scientific impact on people health. For example, buildings with innovative designs and good privacy space will have less chance of obtaining diseases such as Allergy, dust disease and many more. Modern buildings provide enough space for one's privacy. From the above analysis, it is clear that health of people will totally depend upon the construction and design of new buildings.
According to the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out to the conclusion that design of buildings will have a positive impact on people's life and work, further the organizations and builders need to take initial steps to build buildings with proper infrastructure by keeping people healthy in mind.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-10 | vaibhav Ithape | 55 | view |
| 2019-07-23 | nicah | 55 | view |
| 2019-05-05 | Deepika Naresh Rohra | 55 | view |
| 2019-03-27 | bhagyadeep | 55 | view |
| 2018-12-30 | ajayvermaETP | 70 | view |
- Whether studying films at school is as important as studying literature? Do you think school should have curriculum asking students to play old drama and work for theater centuries ago? 77
- Some people believe that academic subjects such as chemistry, physics, and history should be taught in schools, while others believe that students will derive more benefit from studying practical subjects, such as motor mechanics and cooking. 77
- Some people believe laws change human behavior. Do you agree with it? 55
- Experience is a more effective way to teach compared to books Experimental learning or traditional learning in high school and university Which one do you agree is more effective 93
- The traditional subjects are soon moving off in last year s Kindly provide the solutions and ideas to save such subjects 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...y, infrastructure plays a vital role in ones life and health. Modern buildings with ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 426, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...dern buildings provide enough space for ones privacy. From the above analysis, it is...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.5418719212 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 8.36945812808 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 31.9359605911 147% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 1207.87684729 147% => OK
No of words: 326.0 242.827586207 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42944785276 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9636347137 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546012269939 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 553.5 379.143842365 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.1592695757 50.4703680194 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7333333333 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.25397266985 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.560410609714 0.242375264174 231% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187908479187 0.0925447433944 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162617898326 0.071462118173 228% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.363485623794 0.151781067708 239% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125521332809 0.0609392437508 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.