Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree or experience is a more effective way to teach compared to boos, agree or disagree?
The experience is a combination of theoretical and practical knowledge. These days some people believe that education system should have experimental learning rather than closed room education. I am also of the opinion that experimental learning should be part of formal education as there are many advantages. In this essay I shall be providing my viewpoint by analyzing the argument.
Firstly, theory lays down the foundation of any subject. It is very important to understand the concepts so that it can be related to real world. In my view, theory can be well understood if it can be taught by real or practical examples. For instance, there are many scientific laws that can be understood better by experiment. Secondly, I believe that concepts which are learnt by practical experiments can stay long in your brain. So I personally believe that experimental learning should be part of education since it clears the basic concepts.
In conclusion, government should direct schools or universities to refactor the curriculum to introduce practical for each concept so that students can make basic fundamentals strong. In addition to this, experimental learning should be in an easy and friendly way as this will build confidence and improve retaining power.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-08 | farshid2370 | 79 | view |
| 2018-06-10 | saiyedriyaz | 80 | view |
| 2018-05-24 | kakabu4 | 77 | view |
| 2018-05-06 | Navneet Kaushal | 55 | view |
- Problem and benefits for high school students study plays and work of theatres written centuries ago. Discuss and use your own experience. 55
- Some people enjoy extreme sports like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. What are your views on them? 88
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 80
- Whether studying films at school is as important as studying literature? 77
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree or experience is a more effective way to teach compared to boos, agree or disagree? 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 257, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'parted'?
Suggestion: parted
...on that experimental learning should be part of formal education as there are many a...
^^^^
Line 1, column 387, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...my viewpoint by analyzing the argument. Firstly, theory lays down the foundation...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 496, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'parted'?
Suggestion: parted
...ve that experimental learning should be part of education since it clears the basic ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'fundamentals'.
Suggestion: fundamentals
... each concept so that students can make basic fundamentals strong. In addition to this, experiment...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...confidence and improve retaining power.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 31.9359605911 66% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1067.0 1207.87684729 88% => OK
No of words: 202.0 242.827586207 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28217821782 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04265416023 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 139.433497537 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589108910891 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 379.143842365 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8086836405 50.4703680194 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.9166666667 104.977214359 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8333333333 20.9669160288 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.25397266985 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.12807881773 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140620728395 0.242375264174 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548521601518 0.0925447433944 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032118086919 0.071462118173 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0980760271577 0.151781067708 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0195003691081 0.0609392437508 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 12.6369458128 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 55.0591133005 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.