While taking an important decisions in a company the advice of lower level employees should be involved or not?
Lower level employees advice should be involved or not in a company in hotly-debated topic. Where a significant number of people think that advice of lower companinies should be consider other believe that it should not. In this essay, we will discuss about both pros and cons of same.
Needless to say that employees are the backbone of any company. However, company should ask for domain level experts about their experiences so that they can suggest to company about most efficient option. For example, if an app developing company want to change or adapt any new technology so they can ask for open debate where all kind of mindset should join and discuss about the pros and cons of the same.
Nevertheless, if an organisation will raise a requirement which they need so it might possible that employees can refer any other friend or solution which would be cost effective and ultimately will create financial benefits for the organisation. There are lots of things where a higher management not focusing but in long run it might affect the organisation. For example, if same an app developing company want to host their app and for this they are planning to buy a standalone server so might be possible that after discussion with employees, they can choose not to buy whole server instead they can rent a server for a time.
To sum up considering all above mentioned points, it has been seen that it will benefited environment for companies to involve lower level employees which not only provide them a feeling of pride but also they feel connected with companies which will enhance their morale.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-30 | ananddeepsingh | 77 | view |
- What are adventures sports? Should these banned or not? 55
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 77
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 77
- Some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools, especially at the preschool level. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion. 85
- A recent trend in the entertainment world is to adapt classic work of literature for either TV or the movies. One argument is that this is to everyone’s benefit, as it introduces people to works they might otherwise never have experienced, while others 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
Lower level employees advice should be involved or not in a c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Where” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ot in a company in hotly-debated topic. Where a significant number of people think th...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'considered'?
Suggestion: considered
...t advice of lower companinies should be consider other believe that it should not. In th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 81, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'benefit'
Suggestion: benefit
...d points, it has been seen that it will benefited environment for companies to involve lo...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, for example, kind of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 6.10837438424 327% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 5.94088669951 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1338.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88321167883 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63256855129 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521897810219 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 418.5 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.8716893357 50.4703680194 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.8 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4 20.9669160288 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3 7.25397266985 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254810373335 0.242375264174 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127039173256 0.0925447433944 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140522953656 0.071462118173 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18394704168 0.151781067708 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108862442346 0.0609392437508 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.1260098522 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.9458128079 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.