The belching and unauthorized behavior is unacceptable in modern offices. How far you support this view? Give your response with justification.
The belching and unauthorized behavior is unacceptable in modern offices was always a debatable topic. Many people working in corporate offices state that employees behaving with such activities should be punished severely. I strongly agree with the statement that such behaviors is not allowed in modern society. This essay would further elaborate the reasons why such behaviors are not encouraged in office premises with clear examples and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
Firstly, modern established companies and organizations are organized with certain guidelines and policies under different categories to support the workers and for peaceful functioning of offices. Although belching is biological, it is inappropriate method of releasing air from your filled stomach and it is not accepted in social culture that we live. It also disturb other co-workers working with you and make them feel uncomfortable. For example, employee after having heavy lunch in afternoon, releases a sudden gas through his mouth which will be very disturbing to other employees.
Secondly, good understanding between employers and employees is very important as it contributes to the growth of organization but few employees don't follow the policies and create problematic situation. There are various situations which causes these problems and further HR managers have to deal with these complaints accordingly and effectively. Some of the unauthorized problems that we come across in working offices are accessing restricted content from company website makes a huge lose for employer. Furthermore, bullying other employees, bad manners, harassment, abusive language, aggressive and many more. From the above data and example it can analyzed that employee involved in such activities may also lead to termination.
According to the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out to conclusion that people involving in belching and behaving against company policies will be treated with strict policies and sometimes organizations ask employees to put their resignations.
- University only requires to apply digital media rather than continuously upgrading textbook Agree or disagree 82
- Government should reduce their investment in arts music and painting Agree or Disagree 86
- Do you think that formal written examinations are a good way to assess knowledge at school? 72
- Some people believe that academic subjects such as chemistry, physics, and history should be taught in schools, while others believe that students will derive more benefit from studying practical subjects, such as motor mechanics and cooking. 77
- Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease? Pros & Cons? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'disturbs'?
Suggestion: disturbs
...in social culture that we live. It also disturb other co-workers working with you and m...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 146, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...rowth of organization but few employees dont follow the policies and create problema...
^^^^
Line 5, column 350, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...complaints accordingly and effectively. Some of the unauthorized problems that we come acro...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 656, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'analyze'
Suggestion: analyze
... From the above data and example it can analyzed that employee involved in such activiti...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 8.36945812808 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1766.0 1207.87684729 146% => OK
No of words: 306.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77124183007 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0672959587 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630718954248 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 379.143842365 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1008211888 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.142857143 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 2.75862068966 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176731288648 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624590070304 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663365014929 0.071462118173 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100449298438 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069730771809 0.0609392437508 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.