Some people think that university students should specialize in one subject. While others think that university should encourage students to learn a range of subjects. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Few perportion of individuals considered that, university learner’s should study only one subject. Whereas, others believe, university should motivate to students to read different subjects. Before farming any firm opinion, both sides will be discussed in upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, choosing one subject, students can take keenly interest in that subject. For example, there will be no any burden of other subjects. By reading one subject, they can put their heart and soul to learn that subject. As a result, there is no any beyond comparison by giving preference to one subject. Moreover, they can also get optimum opportunity by joining job related to that subject. To’ examplify, students can earn a hefty sum of money by doing progress by leaps and bounds also can fulfill their dreams as well as family too. Therefore, it will be fruitful for them to earn name and fame in the society.
On the flip side, while taking interest in different subjects, learner’s can easily broaden their horizon of knowledge. For instance, they will gain various type of knowledge by reading different subjects which act as a stepping stone in their life to show their exceptional talent in front of others. Hence, by reading wide range of subjects students can uplift the standard of their study level. Last but not the least, they can choose their job related to their interest. For example, reading different subjects, they can get opportunity to choose well paid job in which, they will take interest as compare to specialize in one subject. Consequently, they can make their future bright and live aristocratic lifestyle.
To conclude, it is vividly said that, every coin has two espects. But, according to me, learner’s have to learn different type of subjects. So that they will not only improve their learning skill but also, find supreme outcomes in their life.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-01-18 | Witzbolder | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the total births and the deaths in a European country from 1950 to 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and give comparison where relevant 87
- Some people think that a car is a best way to travel in cities While other believe that bicycle is a better way Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- The tables below gives information related to population growth average birth per woman life expectancy at birth in countries with different income levels in 2000 and 2004 Summarise the information making comparisons where relevant 80
- Some people say that government should break down all the historical buildings and replace them with modern buildings Do you agree or disagree 81
- When a country develops its technology the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...hat subject. For example, there will be no any burden of other subjects. By readin...
^^
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...arn that subject. As a result, there is no any beyond comparison by giving prefere...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, for example, for instance, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15909090909 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7103428611 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.313560698 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.6315789474 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2105263158 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78947368421 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191069501488 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710401453352 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701680064478 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142180627154 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103310861136 0.056905535591 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.