Students in school and university learn far more from lessons with their teachers compared to other sources, such as television or the internet. Do you agree or disagree?
There is a question as to whether virtual education and media in lieu of traditional education and instructors in schools could be more viable for students. It seems to me that both of mentioned ideas may be useful in each level of education to some extent.
First and foremost, instructors play a key role when pupils spend on elementary school. By which I mean the growth of pupils when it comes to learning fundamental teaching relates to teachers’ support, so it must be said that instructors are an integral part of elementary education. Secondly, being students in schools enhances their social skills, and they involve in a relationship with their peers. In addition, given that regularly going to another place except constantly staying home might lead children to be more independent than are children restricted in their residential area; therefore, it is inadvisable that schools are ignored.
Today’s role of technology is remarkable as do teachers and school. Seeing that developments in technology have considerably undeniable speed, it brings virtual education about expanding. Influences of the internet on academic study contributes to individuals achieving unlimited-references. Media as another source is crucial which as a case in point, we could mention the BBS channel which broadcasts a learning English program which assists ones who tend to improve their English language. Student’s academic performance has the need to acquire wisdom from other sources, and it is subsequently clear that schools and teachers are insufficient for this level.
In conclusion, it seems to be unreasonable to eliminate teachers and schools’ role in the learning of children, and it is inadvisable that students merely take part in virtual classes on the internet or utilizing media. Indeed, from my point of view, the optimal situation is to accompaniment of schools and virtual education such as television and internet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-15 | yasirkhan111 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | yasirkhan111 | 73 | view |
| 2018-05-24 | Mehdi.Babaie | 84 | view |
| 2018-05-24 | Mehdi.Babaie | 89 | view |
| 2018-05-24 | Mehdi.Babaie | 73 | view |
- The internet will never replace traditional course books in schools. How far do you agree with this prediction? 84
- Students in school and university learn far more from lessons with their teachers compared to other sources, such as television or the internet. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the world today. Given time, technology will completely replace the teacher in the classroom. Analyze both sides of this argument. 72
- Nowadays, families move to different countries for work. Some people think it has a negative effect on children, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 71
- Some people believe that a good way to reduce crime is longer sentences. Others may think there are alternative ways to this problem. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
There is a question as to whether virtua...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 26, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
There is a question as to whether virtual education and media in lieu of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the internet or utilizing media. Indeed, from my point of view, the optimal situa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, i mean, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46534653465 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23030665911 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577557755776 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7802186362 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.384615385 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240481408191 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826732977899 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637199470737 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138407146381 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633276024413 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.