The government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.
Owing to technology, railways expand more and connect farthest people quickly, due to its breathe taking speed. Government authorities should take more attention towards the development of railways as compared to roads. I agree with this statement, as trains have various benefits such as later one is faster, safer and most importantly comfortably and accommodate more people as compared to buses or other transport vehicles.
National authorities should bring more attention towards the elaboration of railways lines firstly because in transport budget half of the income interest comes from railway department. There is a one-time investment in railway and continuous gain for several years, and also maintenance charges are very less as compared to roads. Secondly, people prefer trains for long distance as trains are comfortable with all facilities and most importantly with a low rate of fare, as in India people consider trains more than buses.
Due to continuous rush on roads, it adds more stress in people's lives when they going to shopping and office. Here, metro railways in various nations are successfully running, is worth mentioning. It reduces the load on the roads as people prefer to go on metro trains because of its high speed. It also consumes less energy as compared to buses or private vehicles burn fossil fuel and produce tonnes of pollution. The government should promote railway usage by providing many facilities in trains such as free internet and a free meal. People also enjoy traveling in trains, for example, toy trains run in Shimla connect distinct areas and it also promotes tourism.
To conclude this, Government should expand railway network to remote areas and cover a large area. It is cost effective, quicker and safer. Roads require continuous maintenance and are cost limiting.
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should write at least 150 words. 61
- Some people use technology to take advice for their medical problems rather than seeing to doctor Why this is so It is positive or negative development according to you 85
- social media has replaced the traditional methods of communicating and people use more and more of social media to communicate and to follow news and events. some people think the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. discuss the advantages and disadvant 56
- some people say that cities with a taller building which means building cities vertically are good other people say that building cities horizontally is better discuss both views and give your opinion 32
- when designing a building the intended use of the building should be taken into account as important rather than outward appearance to what extent do you agree or disagree 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'connect the farthest'.
Suggestion: connect the farthest
...to technology, railways expand more and connect farthest people quickly, due to its breathe taki...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: BREATHE_BREATH[4]
Message: Did you mean 'breath'? 'Breathe' is a verb.
Suggestion: breath
...ect farthest people quickly, due to its breathe taking speed. Government authorities sh...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 311, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... also maintenance charges are very less as compared to roads. Secondly, people pre...
^^
Line 2, column 526, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...people consider trains more than buses. Due to continuous rush on roads, it adds...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27491408935 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67557498113 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560137457045 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8161677176 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.333333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26666666667 7.06120827912 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173057130761 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575454973239 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552113013643 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115024384922 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366767643236 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.