Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
Every living being has the ability to perform certain tasks. It is the law of nature that not everyone can do everything. Among human beings, the differences in the physical and mental strength are the basis of which one can judge whether he or she is capable of doing. This statement does not imply that the believers are chauvininsts or biased thinkers. It only means that they believe that each person has their own strengths and weaknesses, based on which their suitability for a certain task can be assessed.
The most prominent example that everyone can comprehend is that the difference in physique of men and women enable them to do different tasks efficiently. A man, having more physical strength and endurance would be able to do physically draining tasks efficiently, whereas it would a woman more effort to complete the task. There may be situations where it is close to impossible for women to do certain activities.
Men are more suited for tasks involving application of practical skills. For instance, consider motoring skills. It is well known that men have better motoring skills than women. This again does not come to say that women cannot drive well. There are women who drive effortlessly, but the number is very small when compared to the number of men.
Women are more suited for tasks involving application of mind. This does not mean that men cannot apply their mind. It only means that women are masters of the trade. They are more emotionally stable than men and hence it is easier for them to make more sensible decisions. It proved by statistics, that women can make more effective decisions when compared to men.
Another important parameter to consider is that women are capable of multitasking while men are not. This has been proved and has been verified multiple times over the years. This goes to prove that women are better at tasks involving application of mental ability. On a very small scale, it is evident from the daily schedules followed at home, that women can effortlessly manage all tasks at home simultaneously. This is a very compelling case with working women, who manage to make things ready in the kitchen for themselves and the family, set things right at home and also get ready for their work at the same time.
There are exceptional cases in both genders, where people perform tasks par excellence. However, it is to be noted, that exceptions do not account for the majority.
The above stated situations are some examples to show that people are designed to do certain tasks efficiently, while they may not be able to excel in some other situations. In conclusion, it is appropriate to say that men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | Arpit Sahni | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | nikhil40507 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Sumaiya Mila | 75 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | rahulkcr97 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Warafta | 75 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ptions do not account for the majority. The above stated situations are some exa...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, so, well, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.5258426966 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 25.0 11.3162921348 221% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2305.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 470.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90425531915 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61268365661 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470212765957 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 727.2 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 6.24550561798 288% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.0816053323 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3703703704 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4074074074 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2962962963 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344970022925 0.243740707755 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967834128434 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149126967042 0.0758088955206 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16915538932 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121081586447 0.0667264976115 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.