Today our lifestyle is changing and affects family relationships. Do advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In society nowadays, family roles is becoming more and more crucial in every aspect of human life. Recently, there are some argument whether people’s lifestyle altering has impacts on family relationship or not? This issue has both beneficial and detrimental effects which are going to be examined in this essay.
From one point of view, a state of art lifestyle is extremely convenient for household. With regard to the first idea, technological advance developed dramatically in recent days. It is identified that technological devices have essential roles in family relationships. Computers, for instance, are served as contacting equipment by members in family. It means that children, who live far away from their parents, keep in touch with them by Facebook on computers. To conclude, should high-tech devices not be available, people in family will be harsh to contact to each other.
Aside from aforementioned arguments, modern lifestyle decreases dramatically the friendliness of family relationship. Looking the former, technology makes people further and further day by day. An explanation could be that members in family do not have chance to directly commute together. It is exemplified that students of remote areas studying in Ho Chi Minh city scarcely share their daily stories with their relatives because of a lack of technological facilities. To sum up, should people have opportunities to contact with their family, they will be close-knit tightly.
In conclusion, although lifestyle which is modifying has a variety of benefits, it still has some negative effects. I would argue that the advantages of a change of lifestyle overshadows the disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-24 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2024-10-24 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-01 | tata | 11 | view |
| 2024-10-01 | tata | 11 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | tata | 56 | view |
- the pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in australia and france in 1980 and 2000. 73
- the bar graph 11
- the best way to..... 61
- The table below gives information about the average annual spending of university students in 3 different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 91
- The 57
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, so, still, for instance, in conclusion, to sum up, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48461538462 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12585136332 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634615384615 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.1998787712 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.125 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14859795612 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503970212479 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589209898596 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946872743924 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372318546316 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.